Flo, E. E.; Flo, G. M.

A hallmark of learning is the need for sensory stimuli (Ginns, 2015; McGraw et al., 2009; Reinwein, 2012; Spence, 1950) so that learning is fundamentally based on sensory input signals affecting behaviour, physiology, and neurology. If behavioural measures of learning can be causally linked to physiological and neurological variables, a broader understanding of the mechanisms related to learning in schools, learning disabilities, and learning and health issues may emerge (McGraw et al., 2009). Despite decades of research on the physiological/neurological variable of sympathetic activation, learning, and achievement (Horvers et al., 2021), any causal relation remains unclear (Cowley et al., 2014; Mason et al., 2020; Pijeira-Diaz et al., 2016; Sung et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2024) and issues with instrument validation remain (Costantini et al., 2023; Hu et al., 2024; Milstein & Gordon, 2020; Van Der Mee et al., 2021). Here we investigate the effect of sensory input on sympathetic activation by using validated instruments for skin conductance measurement (Batista et al., 2019) and whether sympathetic activation is connected to learning in a cognitive laboratory context and an ecologically valid classroom context. In both contexts, we found a physiological variable which correlated with learning and that sensory input affected this variable while student movement did not. These sensory inputs varied depending on the different instructional activities the students participated in. Together, these findings bring us one step closer to a model linking sensory input to behavioural, physiological, and neurological variables.