Phelps, E. C.; Yong, L.; Prentice, P.; Fraser, B. A.; Postma, E.; Wilson, A. J.

Matching habitat choice provides a mechanism for individuals to maximise their expected fitness by selecting an environment that better fits their phenotype. Many animals choose their local environment by evaluating levels of perceived predation risk against possible resource gain. To test if predation risk is a major driver of habitat choice, we quantify scototaxis, or preference for dark versus light backgrounds, in juvenile guppies. As light backgrounds increase visibility to predators, this aspect of habitat choice captures variation in boldness in small fishes. By rearing and testing 586 fish descended from ten natural populations from Trinidad under common garden conditions, we first quantify (broad sense) heritable variation, i.e. evolutionary potential, within populations. Next, we test for evolutionary divergence among populations in mean preference, and if present, whether ancestral predation regime is a mediator of divergence. Finally, we ask whether families and/or populations differ in the amount of behavioural variation they contain. Habitat choice varied among families (12% of total variance), consistent with heritable variation (0.2). We also found mean preference varies among populations (11% of total variance explained). Evolutionary divergence among-populations is partly explained by ancestral predation regime, with populations from low-predation sites showing a stronger average preference for dark backgrounds than high-predation populations from the same river. Additionally, we find that within-population behavioural variation is greater in high-predation populations. We conclude that guppy populations contain heritable variation that could facilitate adaptive evolution if scototaxis is subject to natural selection. Furthermore, while genetic drift may also contribute to evolutionary divergence among-populations, observed patterns are qualitatively consistent with local adaption to predation regime. Our results suggests that high predation sites favour 'bolder' habitat choice on average, but also that local predation regime shape the evolutionary dynamics of variation, perhaps by maintaining shy-bold variation among-individuals or by favouring individuals with less-predicable behaviour.